The New James Bond: My three candidates

Who replaces Daniel Craig as James Bond? My three picks.

Advertisements

Spectre is thriving at the box office and even though Daniel Craig is contractually obligated to scrap on the tux, take a beating and pound shaken martinis one more time, I want to talk about the future of the franchise. Who plays him next? Craig sounded exhausted on the press tour for the latest adventure, so I would be surprised if he did more than one more ride. He has one foot out the door so let’s talk who plays him next. Here are my three candidates.

Michael Fassbender

He is suave, taunt, intense and has the build to slide right into MI6’s high wire theatrics. He hasn’t played a character like this either, yet built his career similar to Craig’s on solid roles and art house fare. He has a head start on the mainstream, having played Magneto and Steve Jobs in recent movies. The point is, seeing Fassbender here wouldn’t be tiring or a sad case of “seen that, forget it” misfortune. He can act and slays the ladies. Did you watch Shame? He can play a sad Lothario as well.

Tom Hardy

Cut from the same type of bulldog mold as Craig, Hardy has proven himself in action roles yet fares equally well in independent films. He has a presence that few can attain through film school or director longing. When he shows up, authenticity takes precedent over mere make believe. He’s played a Batman villain, filled Mad Max’s shoes, and rocked different accents in Locke and The Drop. His role in Bronson will forever be his ticket to the table, but signature roles in Lawless and the recent Legend stamp his place as a force to reckon with. I can easily picture him as the first Bond with a five o’clock shadow.

Idris Elba

Suck it Anthony Horowitz. The Bond author slammed the British actor’s credentials as a future Bond because he was too “street”. Aka too black. How shortsighted and unfortunate. If you have taken the time to watch Luther, the BBC detective series with Idris leading the party, you know how good he would be as Britain’s most famous cinematic creation. He has the look, the voice and the build to knock the role out. He also may add a sense of humor to the reckless agent.

These are my three guys. My bet is Craig shrugs his shoulders and takes a huge paycheck to come back for a 5th film. He wasn’t the problem with Spectre but the director and writer need to produce a better setting and appetite for the actor to play around in. If he leaves, go with one of the sly fellows mentioned above.

“Steve Jobs” will make you dream big again about movies

Steve Jobs is a movie that shows you how cinema can truly teach and engage at the same time.

“You don’t care how much money a person makes. You care about what they make.”

People want they can’t have. They need it to be whole again, if only for a moment. Steve Jobs knew this and dedicated his entire life to giving the people what they wanted. Options on a computer. Easy hook ups. Internet. Music in their pocket. The ability to have it all right in their palm. He just needed time to create his masterpiece. Like a painter figuring out which brush he should use first. He had to fail hard again and again before he put it all together.

Danny Boyle’s new film, written by the maestro of dialogue Aaron Sorkin, is exhilarating, propulsive and engages the mind because it effects everyone who carries an Apple laptop around, an iPhone, iPod, iPad or iWatch. It all started with Jobs. This movie makes you dream big again about the power of cinema and what it can do when used right.

Boyle’s film chronicles three events in Jobs life. The launch of Macintosh in 1984, the opening of Jobs’ independent project Next in 1988 and the legendary launch of the iMac in 1998. Two failed, and one exploded.

In order to properly tell the story, you need great actors. One of a kind talents who can morph into any shape or form on a movie screen. You DON’T need Ashton Kutcher. Boyle’s greatest move here is putting British chameleon Michael Fassbender into the arrogant conductor’s skin for two hours. While he was a genius at knowing where pieces went and the big picture of technology, Jobs was a mean guy. A bad father and a worse friend. Everyone who stood face to face with him was a debate opponent. His own daughter couldn’t get compassionate love. As Jobs says towards the end of the film, “I was poorly made.”

If all you know about Jobs are the pictures of him at launches smiling at the crowd looking like God, Fassbender takes you inside the demons that curled and pinched inside his chest. The man had a wounded heart that seemed to never get completed before birth. His wiring was different, like in a computer where one plug needs to go into a certain outlet or the system breaks down. Calling Fassbender Oscar worthy is like calling coffee hot on arrival. It’s like saying the rain will make your clothes wet. This isn’t a performance. This is a transformation that peels Jobs like an onion. The man goes from Magneto to Jobs in a blink. That’s power.

Kate Winslet is nearly his equal as the long suffering assistant Joanna Hoffman. Fassbender and Winslet share many scenes literally firing verbal bullets at one another. She knew everything that he didn’t and knew how he worked better than most. When he needed to know which door was his door, Hoffman told him. When he couldn’t understand his daughter’s need for attention, he needed her. Without Hoffman, Jobs would have been a mad man stuck in a garage.

Jeff Daniels needs to work with Sorkin more. The writer’s words fit the actor’s speed. The Newsroom duo reteam here for Daniels’ former CEO and disgraced boss John Sculley. Throughout all the misery, Sculley was a father figure for Jobs, and watching Fassbender and Daniels trade dialogue like they were two tennis players on a hard court is award worthy itself. If there was an Oscar for best exchange in a film, these two guys get it hands down. Their tragic final moments will haunt you as the credits roll.

For the people who are still convinced Seth Rogen can’t act, come watch him work here as Steve Wozniak, the Ringo to Jobs’ Lennon and the guy who created the world that Jobs wanted but never got the credit. As the fumbling yet passionate partner in crime, Rogen instills Wozniak with compassion to balance the pride that is spread around the floor. A maker of the switchboard and the internal dynamics of the Mac never got the recognition he deserved and in three separate scenes, pleads with Jobs over giving credit to his co-workers. The acting here is so magical that you forget these are actors and just go with the flow of the film.

Michael Stuhlbarg(Arnold Rothstein on Boardwalk Empire) imbues the innocent yet Jobs flame resistant Andy Hertzfeld, the guy who Jobs told to complete impossible missions before the launch. When you go through your everyday life, remember that one man threatened another’s life because he couldn’t make a computer say “hello” on time. That’s the Tao of Steve and Andy.

Throughout it all, Sorkin and Boyle are rocket launchers. Sorkin’s dialogue is like David Mamet on steroids. A hyper kinetic orchestra of words, timing and emotion. He adapted a script from Walter Issacson’s book on Jobs. Boyle has worked with great writers before but he found his Jimmy Page in Sorkin. Someone who could give him the words required to make a masterpiece. Boyle has done it all. 28 Days Later. Trainspotting. 127 Hours. The underrated Sunshine. Slumdog Millionaire. His films defy genre placing and that’s why he is great. He doesn’t miss when he goes behind the camera and he may have created his best film here in Steve Jobs.

The movie plays out like Birdman’s sibling. One location. Long uncut takes of people walking and talking. The ability to do so much with so little is amazing. Boyle, Sorkin, Fassbender, Daniels, Rogen, Winslet, Stuhlbarg and company all deserve a mention for putting egos to the side and creating this masterpiece.

That’s the best thing about the fall/winter season of film. The overload of great movies. As much as I enjoyed Furious 7, Avengers: Age of Ultron or whatever else arrived in the summer, October through December is the greatest time for cinema. It’s when the ring is cleared for the heavyweights. Films like The Martian, The Walk, Bridge of Spies and Steve Jobs. Movies that means something, are powerful and engage a viewer like few other films can. It’s where Hollywood breaks out its greatest hits record and gives it a fine polish.

Steve Jobs was a jerk but he knew it. He was a genius at everything that didn’t have to do with human emotion. If you don’t know who he is, look him up on your phone. If you are holding an iPhone, you are able to look up Steve Jobs because of Steve Jobs. As George Jung, played by Johnny Depp, said at the end of the great film Blow, “My ambition far exceeded my talent.” To me, that’s Steve Jobs.

If you crave a dose of history that connects directly to the present and the future, watch Steve Jobs. Better yet, just go watch it. Steve Jobs dreamed big. So should we.

Michael Fassbender makes Assassin’s Creed interesting

The one reason that gets me turned on about the latest video game adaptation is Michael Fassbender partaking in the fun.

When it comes to adapting a massively popular video game, filmmakers and actors have their work cut out for them. It’s a dangerous walk. The last thing professional make believe players want to do is offend the 24/7 video game binge addict who drinks more Mountain Dew’s and Red bulls than humanly possible and calls a Big Gulp cup his spouse. I am NOT a video game addict or player. So when I see the first look at the December 16th, 2016 film Assassin’s Creed and see Michael Fassbender in armor sporting a menacing look, I am intrigued.

michael fassbender assassin's creed

The game could be about whatever you desire, but Fassbender instantly hooks me. Respected, talented and always watchable performers do that for a film-addict. We see, decide if this is for us and then wait for something else. This film is still a year away, but that doesn’t mean a picture can’t speak 365 words.

What’s it about? The film introduces a new character into the game’s world, Callum Lynch, a rogue assassin who finds out his ancestors provided him with quite substantial powers and he uses those to fight the evil Templar organization in the modern sophisticated world. Sound interesting? Well, that’s all you got to run on right now. Just keep staring at that picture. Pretty cool right?

The film co-stars the beautifully talented French actress Marion Cotillard, and is directed by Justin Kurzel(Snowtown, Macbeth), a name you may not recognize but has been given a decent two headed cast to push this adaptation forward.

The recent failure of Agent 47 rings doubt across the waters that spell success or not for Assassin’s Creed. As I say with any movie, it depends on the script and the care put into the production. If it’s there, there’s always a chance.

What do you think of this first look? Good, bad, or forget about it?

What else is new at the moment?

*More coffee is always a good thing, but espresso is best.

*Politicians aren’t robots in suits because they get caught having sexy time with wrong people too often.

*The St. Louis Cardinals are very good.

*The N.L. Central will have three playoff teams so suck it league colleagues.

*Just because a person goes on a murderous rampage doesn’t mean he or she is insane….they could just be evil. It happens.

*Staying fit is a well known plan. It’s just not easy to follow through with. You are either a shape or in shape.

Goodnight,

Buffa